HILLARY, YOUR TIME FOR HONORING YOURSELF WILL SOON BE AT AN END

CLICK HERE TO READ WHAT "DEMS" THINK OF THE HILLDABEAST

Since taking office in 2001, HILLARY Clinton has delivered $500 million worth of earmarks that have specifically benefited 59 corporations. a review by the Los Angeles Times shows NEARLY ALL of those corporations provided funds to her campaigns through donations made by employees, executives, board members or lobbyists.

Her record stands in contrast with others in the Senate seeking the presidency, particularly John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.). McCain, who has long opposed earmarks, does not write them. Obama has used the device, but now declines to earmark funds for private companies; he uses earmarks only to secure funds for government projects such as road building and hospital construction. Other senators seeking the presidency provide earmarks to home-state constituents and collect donations from recipients of the federal largesse. But The Times review found that Clinton does it on a different scale.
For example, in the appropriations bills that have passed the Senate so far this year, Clinton earmarked 216 separate projects for a total of $236.6 million. Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.) secured $112.8 million; Obama earmarked $90.4 million, and Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) earmarked projects totaling $70.8 million.
Since Clinton arrived in the Senate, she has collected in excess of $1 million from earmark beneficiaries and their associates.
“This pattern shows that Clinton has made aggressive use of the pay-to-play earmark game,” said Keith Ashdown, research director for the Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan research organization in Washington. 

Because of her perch on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Clinton has been able to earmark $1.4 billion for defense contractors in New York state since she arrived in the Senate, including $140 million this year, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense. Her record of home-state defense earmarking on that panel is second only to that of Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), who is chairman of the committee and has served in the Senate since 1979.
Clinton has raised more than $270,000 for her campaigns from defense companies with New York operations that have received federal money with her help.

Clinton has delivered multimillion-dollar defense earmarks to a company making improvements to bomb racks for B1 fighter jets; to a small Buffalo-area firm that provides anticorrosive coating to military vehicles; and to the Manhattan-based New School University for a defense mapping project. Individuals associated with these entities have donated to her campaign.
New School, which received $1.6 million in this year’s defense budget and $6 million previously, is particularly well-connected. Its president, former Sen. Bob Kerrey (D-Neb.), is campaigning for Clinton in Iowa. Three school trustees are among Clinton’s most prominent backers, having each raised at least $100,000 for her campaign. A former trustee is Norman Hsu, who was indicted on fraud charges last week. After Hsu’s criminal past was revealed last summer, Clinton returned $850,000 he raised for her.

Clinton’s notable earmark activity is not explained solely by the fact that she represents a populous state. The extent of her earmarking far outstrips that of Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), for example, who represents a larger state. Boxer secured $79 million in earmarks this year, according to the taxpayers group.
Like all presidential candidates, Clinton places a premium on bundlers, people who use their networks of friends and associates to raise large sums of money. Clinton singles out people who raise $100,000 or more as “Hillraisers.”
At least eight Hillraisers are affiliated with recipients of her earmarks. One is James Flaws, chief financial officer of one of New York’s major employers, Corning Inc. Once heavy GOP donors, Corning employees have given Clinton $236,000 since 1999, including $106,000 for her presidential campaign.
“The system is broken,” said lobbyist George Hochbrueckner, a Clinton backer and former New York congressman, who represents several companies that have received earmarks with Clinton’s help. “Until it is fixed, you have got get good people elected and they’ve got to play by the rules. Right now the rules allow exactly what Hillary is doing.”

Yeah, I LIED, er, Misspoke I Mean

Maybe she can just imagine she is winning. Just like she imagined she was under sniper fire in Bosnia.

“Ready to lead — day one.” But where??

Sen. Hillary Clinton was telling Wolf Blitzer that she didn’t think “the Pakistani government at this time under President Musharraf has any credibility at all.” She then said something that betrayed a serious lack of knowledge about Pakistan and called her own credibility on the subject into serious question. “If President Musharraf wishes to stand for election,” she told Blitzer, “then he should abide by the same rules that every other candidate will have to follow.” My immediate reaction was: “Did I hear that correctly?” As a Pakistan analyst, I know for a fact that Pervez Musharraf doesn’t wish to stand for election any time soon…

A typical Democrat ignoramus:

Sen. Clinton really didn’t know that the upcoming elections were for individual seats in Pakistan’s parliament. She actually believed that Bhutto, Nawaz and Musharraf would be facing off as individual candidates for leadership of the country in the upcoming elections. Sen. Clinton didn’t know that Nawaz Sharif isn’t allowed to run for office in Pakistan because of a felony conviction. She didn’t know that President Musharraf won’t be on the ballot because he’s already been elected. Sen. Clinton, a candidate for the leadership of the free world, apparently doesn’t know the first thing about the country referred to by some as “the most dangerous place on earth.”

Should Hillary Clinton be in jail?

On January 21, 1993, Bill's first full day in office, she and Bill shook some 1,800 hands in three hours.

"We just screwed all these people," she whispered to her husband - a comment heard on network television.

YEAH, RIGHT. 

THE LIZARD QUEEN AND FAITH, THAT'S RICH.

WATCH HER COMMIT, ON TAPE, THE  $ LARGEST $  ELECTION FRAUD IN HISTORY

The Hillary Project  reporting the news about Hillary that the media refuses to

  Hillary …LET'S SEE THOSE TAX RECORDS... NOW! 

Her lifelong pattern of secrecy was once again evident at the OHIO DEBATE. While publicly promoting transparency in government, she steadfastly refuses to release her personal income tax returns. That’s a clear tip-off that there’s something to hide. Recall that the Clintons selectively released tax returns in Arkansas, but refused to go back to 1980, when Hillary had her windfall in cattle futures.

During the debate, Hillary suggested that she’d release the returns “soon,” but her staff quickly backtracked. She implied that she’s been too busy to deal with releasing the returns. Does she really think anyone believes that it will take more than simply making a copy of the return? She’s stalling and there’s a reason for that.

Most likely, the return will show how much Bill has been making from his partnership with the Sheik of Dubai and his other business ventures. Should the spouse of a presidential candidate be in business with a foreign leader who needs favors from the U.S. government? Definitely not. That’s why we’ll never see those returns.

And then there are the Clinton Library records that document her schedule as first lady. She doesn’t want them released either because they will definitively show that she was never the co-president. The Library has been stalling on the release of those documents for years. During the debate, she said that she wanted them released as quickly as possible and seemed to blame the Bush administration for the delay. But today, the White House indicated that she had made no requests for any expedited release.

OH, AND IF WE ADOPT HILLARYCARE, WHERE WILL THE ALL CANADIANS GO TO SEE A DOCTOR? LOL 

QUOTE OF THE DAY